
Here is a riddle. What is both old and new? What was built in the 1800s and by me?
The answer is that our home, which was old, became “new” through an unusual process and sequence of events.
President Abraham Lincoln signed the Homestead Act, which allowed settlers to claim 160 acres of land and eventually own it after meeting the requirements of the law by staying on the land a requisite number of years.
Pursuant to the Homestead Act, a log cabin was built on an original homestead in the area of what is now Estes Park, Colorado. Later the homesteaders built a larger log house. I did not build the cabin or the house, nor did I claim the homestead. Someone else did all that before I was born.
What I did was rescue those buildings when a developer purchased the last eight acres of what had been a 160 acre homestead. Over the years, the homestead was cut up into parcels that became valuable parts of the Village of Estes Park. The last eight acres were across from a golf course and up the street from the high school and the fairgrounds. It became a desirable spot for building condos across from the golf course, or so the developer thought.
The Village of Estes Park interfered with his plans when the board refused to approve a demolition permit for the log structures on the old homestead site, which was probably unconstitutional since the homestead had not been designated an historic landmark. The developer offered to donate the buildings to the town if it would move them off his land. “Put them in a park if you like them so much,” he told the board.
Around that time, I came along. As self-proclaimed King of the Wild Frontier, I offered to move the buildings to my land, which is in the same county as Estes Park, on the condition that the Larimer County building inspectors would look at the buildings as they stood in Estes and pre-approve me for moving them to our ranch. I knew we needed a new foundation and new plumbing and electric and new roof and new windows, and I knew we could not move the 30 foot high stone fireplace and chimney, but I wanted the structure of the logs approved. I did not want to be told after moving them that the beams were not engineered correctly or according to current codes.
Well, the building inspectors did approve my proposal and the developer was glad to get me to do the removal, which turned out to be a complicated project. That is when I became a contractor.
I took a friend of mine to see the buildings before I made the deal, to ask if he thought it was worth doing. He had moved a cabin out of the mountains himself, which he used as the core of a house he built. An old cowboy, Ray offered, “Me and Brian could move them for you.”
Brian had just graduated from high school. A rodeo bullrider, he was a big help as an acrobat tearing down the steeply peaked roof. Ray and Brian and another guy lived in the original cabin while they took apart the larger one log by log. I rented a crane for the job. They numbered the logs. for each wall in order to put the walls back together in the same order. It took from November 1992 until February 1993 to take it apart and get it off the Estes property.
The small cabin was not disassembled. It was jacked up and moved intact, then placed on a new foundation. The big house was moved by log trucks. It was too wide and tall and heavy to be moved in one piece.
Then the fun began of putting them back together. I will write about the rest of the process in serial style.
Donating to the County
I noticed that my pickup is soon going to need new tires. Also, as a diesel, it will need new glow plugs, which cost about $900. I love my truck, but I don’t love the expense of maintaining it. So, I am going to enter into negotiations with Larimer County about donating it to the county, but with some strings attached.
I got the idea from reading about the potential donation of Roberts Ranch to Larimer County, Colorado. The deal that was on the table, as I understand it, is that the ranch will remain a ranch in perpetuity and the donor will have a life estate in the property, meaning she will still be able to live there, but the county will pay for operating the ranch and the public will not have access to it like normal open space owned by the county; instead there will only be limited tours and some fishing and hunting permits.
That got me thinking. The county can own my pickup. That way I won’t pay the taxes on it for keeping it licensed. It will be in the county’s name. The citizens of Larimer County won’t get my payment of the registration fees and taxes. Instead, they can all chip in as taxpayers.
As the owner, the county government will pay for the new tires, glow plugs and other maintenance. I’m especially looking forward to having them pay for fuel. After all, that is part of keeping it running.
I will reserve a life estate and thus continue to drive it.
What is the benefit to taxpayers? Well, they will get to look at it as I drive around. (This is negotiable, but I might be willing to have a Larimer County decal placed on the truck so all will know it is owned by the county.)
If this works out the way I want, I could next donate my law office. The overhead is killing me. The county can pay my rent and other costs of operation. One of the costs of operation will be my salary. That will be a relief for me to not have to worry about. If other lawyers become jealous, they can do their own negotiating.
Query: Will the taxpayers of Larimer County be glad to pay for upkeep on a gift that they cannot fully use?